Assignment#7 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

subsidisation7 - Case Study ExampleOn the former(a) hand, nations also owe a resembling responsibility to their citizens and, in addition, they also have the onus to ensure their well being.In immigration cases, the resolve consider a lot of aspects and prescribe excessively high standard of proof of persecution from the sanctuary seekers in advance deciding their cases (p.236). In this context, it becomes relevant that such immigrants often may not be in a position to fulfill the demands of the host nations. From the instances of the application of inconsistent regulations as well as the lack of fair game human rights assessments while deciding immigration cases, it transpires that there is an element of bias prevailing among some of the resolve (p.236). Due to their lack of adequate insight into the socio-political situations in the refugees homelands, these judges downplay their likelihood of prosecution (p.236). This may, perhaps, be the reason for the large volume of case s pending in various immigration courts.On the new(prenominal) hand, bear witness also suggests to the pendency of a large number of social credentials adjudications in the country. On a come near level, since the government of a nation has an obligation to ensure the welfare of its citizens, it may appear that social security of own people deserves precedence over the rights of the people from other countries. However, this issue needs to be understand and explored on a deeper level. Asylum seekers are usually people who have no alternative other than seek refuge in an alien country because of turmoil and possible persecution in their nation of origin. In this regard, it needs to be appreciated that in normal circumstances, unless there is threat to a persons value and belief systems, he or she may not want to abandon the homeland. Thus, it becomes evident that asylum seekers are leaving their countries due to the obvious threat to or violation of their human rights.On the oth er hand, the question of social security